Count as high as possible before a moderator posts

[Icefire]

0....HA!!!!!!

[James Gryphon]

See page 164; we recently changed the rules so that people can't always zero anymore.

-26.

[Gonff]

-25

[James Gryphon]

-26.

[Gonff]

-25

[James Gryphon]

-26!!!!

[Gonff]

-25

[Taggerung_of_Redwall]

-26

[James Gryphon]

-27.

[Taggerung_of_Redwall]

-28

[James Gryphon]

Negative twenty-nine.

[Tiria Wildlough]

  -28

[DanielofRedwall]

-27.

I don't really get all the new rules, I haven't been on this game for a while and I can't be bothered reading through all of them! So, in a brief overview, what's happening?

[Gonff]

-26

When one of the moderators posts negative one they will state a name and that person is the only one who can zero it. When one of the other people posts one they will state a moderators name and that moderator is the only one who can zero it. If you are not the person who can zero it you can only bring it up (or if you are a moderator bring it down) by one. Also I think James has become a "wild" player. So he will always be adding to the side that has the initiative, never zeroing or counting back. So here is his example of this:

So for an example:
If Gonff takes it to 1, I could bring it up to 2. If Tagg brings it down to -1, I could do -2. In neither case would I zero it out or negate the value.

If we're at zero and I want to count one way, I'd decide on my own which one to take it into.

[Icefire]

Ok, so if I understand this correctly, only Galedeep can zero it for the members right now, right? Leave the forum for a week and what do they do? change all the rules!

-25