Count as high as possible before a moderator posts 2.0

The Skarzs · January 15, 2014, 10:11:24 PM

38

Rainshadow · January 15, 2014, 10:16:59 PM

39.

Ungatt Trunn · January 15, 2014, 11:28:58 PM

40!

Rainshadow · January 16, 2014, 12:51:18 AM

41.

Dawnwing · January 16, 2014, 01:41:17 AM

36

Leatho Shellhound · January 16, 2014, 03:18:40 AM

37

Tam and Martin · January 16, 2014, 02:48:44 PM

38

Rainshadow · January 16, 2014, 02:57:09 PM

39.

Tam and Martin · January 16, 2014, 03:00:35 PM

40

Leatho Shellhound · January 16, 2014, 03:18:10 PM

We will prevail, for we are many!!

41

Tam and Martin · January 16, 2014, 03:44:54 PM

42

rachel25 · January 16, 2014, 04:45:49 PM

43
When are we going to chose someone to set it back to whatever number we started at.

The Skarzs · January 16, 2014, 05:12:01 PM

44

I dunno.

Blazemane · January 17, 2014, 12:18:43 AM

Quote from: rachel25 on January 16, 2014, 04:45:49 PM
43
When are we going to chose someone to set it back to whatever number we started at.

If you're asking about one of us being chosen, we won't have anyone to pull our number back up to 0 until and if we get below 0. But if you're asking about one of the moderators being chosen who can pull the number down to 0, that was done earlier. That's Brookskimmer.

45

Leatho Shellhound · January 17, 2014, 01:33:25 AM

46

News:

Count as high as possible before a moderator posts 2.0