Count as high as possible before a moderator posts 2.0

[Rosie Willowwater]

0 

[Sebias of Redwall]

*is tired of restarting*
2

I think some rules need to be changed...


1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[The Grey Coincidence]

2

[Keva Strongbow]

3

[Rosie Willowwater]

1

I mean, you did get to 34...

[Russa Nodrey]

2

[DanielofRedwall]

*is tired of restarting*
2

I think some rules need to be changed...

I disagree entirely. If anything, it is still weighted heavily towards members. Like Rosie said, you still reached 34, which is way more than the totals that used to be reached. Those "records" that we track were reached when the rules were heavily swayed one way or the other.

To give you some idea of the original intentions of this game, have a look at the earliest posts on the first topic, which came about when there were way more active moderators than there are now. The members were lucky to reach double digits, but I guess that's neither here nor there now.

Anyway, -3.

[The Grey Coincidence]

I personally think the new rules make things fun and exciting (or at least, the rules we are using now)
Like- would you guys (non-mods) be complaining if someone had been like "Oh no you don't!" And posted after Rosie did?
I agree with Daniel here- this is still in our favour. I can't really think of any balance changes. Like increasing how much admin/mods can decrease things? That involves more number grinding and boy... me and numbers don't mix.
-2

[Russa Nodrey]

-1

[Jack the Quick]

0. I think there needs to be more mods...

[Sebias of Redwall]

0. I think there needs to be more mods...

I'll be a mod...

1

[Russa Nodrey]

2

[Jack the Quick]

3

[Russa Nodrey]

4

[Rosie Willowwater]

2