Count as high as possible before a moderator posts 2.0

[lass of something much]

159

[DanielofRedwall]

154
This is exactly why I want it back to mods/admins automatically bring it back to 0, cause all it takes is one or two members to just post for a day to bring it up ridiculously high.

[lass of something much]

155.
fact is, it's really annoying as is, and I don't know about the other beasts here, but I'll get very sick of it very quickly, and it'll kill all hope...

[Booklover]

156. Yes, but then it takes just one mod to take it all the way back down and ruin all our hard effort.

[lass of something much]

157

[Booklover]

158

[lass of something much]

159

[Booklover]

160

[lass of something much]

161

[DanielofRedwall]

Yes, but then it takes just one mod to take it all the way back down and ruin all our hard effort.

...Which was kinda the point of the original game. At the start, members were lucky to get it to double digits. Right now it's impossible for mods.

Anyway 156

[lass of something much]

157.
it's not hard for you, you get to count by 5!
@shisteer of nothing much

[Booklover]

158. Don't you believe in me, Lass?

[lass of something much]

159. no, I'm just saying that the mods have it easy

[DanielofRedwall]

154

[lass of something much]

155