Visualizing Redwall animals on two or four legs

[Ashleg]

That's true, but then why'd it be okay for Mr.Otter there to not wear pants?

[The Skarzs]

I believe that was actually Winifred in the series. . .

[Krantor the Brutal]

I guess kids before weren't as "dirty-minded". Just saying...

[Ashleg]

That's what I'm trying to say, though, which is that there's nothing 'dirty' about it and the other characters didn't react as if something was wrong with her.

[MeadowR]

I tend to think of these characters as having long tunics or/and other clothes that would go a bit - or longer - over their thighs.

[Krantor the Brutal]

Same here. But I still have difficulty visualizing footwear.

[The Skarzs]

Footwear just seems awkward.

[sunflashtheace]

I would say two because thats how they are pictured

[Ashleg]

Footwear just seems awkward.

I don't know why, but I can see footwear working so long as it's like Scrooge McDuck where it doesn't cover the whole paw and is basically useless...

[The Skarzs]

I suppose. More of fashion than anything.

[Ashleg]

Aye.

((Well, in my head, they don't really need clothes and it's all just for expression.))

[The Skarzs]

There is a certain amount of decency they feel the need for, though. Like in the Rogue Crew and the hedgehog whose spines and fur were falling out.

[Ashleg]

Spines and fur falling out, yeah, cover that, nobeast wants to see you because you look like you have a disease even if you don't and that's not the case.

'Tis still unpleasant to look at.

Otherwise, though?