Bigfoot

[HeadInAnotherGalaxy]

A quote from The Santa Clause:

Seeing isn't believing. Believing is seeing.

So you believe in the Loch Ness monster and other creatures like that are real too?

Aye, ah dae.

[Redwaller]

Not all the facts point to Bigfoot not existing.

There's no facts that point to Bigfoot existing ... absolutely none. Same with the Loch Ness Monster and all the other boogeymen.

Sooo not true! There ARE several facts that point to Bigfoot existence. For example, Sientice found records from Native Amaricans telling about how some Big, hairy, ape-like creature stole food from them. But those arn't the only facts that point to Bigfoot's existence. Its impossable to say that there are no facts that point to Bigfoot's existence. But, at the same time, there arn't any facts that absolutly prove that Bigfoot truly exists...

You shouldn't believe everything Scientists and TV say.

[Ungatt Trunn]

Not all the facts point to Bigfoot not existing.

There's no facts that point to Bigfoot existing ... absolutely none. Same with the Loch Ness Monster and all the other boogeymen.

Sooo not true! There ARE several facts that point to Bigfoot existence. For example, Sientice found records from Native Amaricans telling about how some Big, hairy, ape-like creature stole food from them. But those arn't the only facts that point to Bigfoot's existence. Its impossable to say that there are no facts that point to Bigfoot's existence. But, at the same time, there arn't any facts that absolutly prove that Bigfoot truly exists...

You shouldn't believe everything Scientists and TV say.

But these were accounts from Pilgrems, who had talked to the Native Americans, who told them about "Bigfoot". It might have not have been Bigfoot, but at the same time, it might have...

[Buzz_Bumble]

Someone mentioned the searching for Bigfoot TV show. There's a similar show hunting for aliens / UFOs. In one episode the looney "expert" was claiming that a tiny ancient Mayan charm was a depiction of a spaceship, because he thought it looked like an aeroplane and obviously ancient Mayans can't have seen an aeorplane ... he refused point blank to even remotely consider it to be anything else. To anyone with an ounce of common sense, the charm was obviously the depiction of a fish with the "wings" being fins.

Many of these so-called "experts" and hunters are so obssessed with wanting things to be real, that they ignore all common sense and intelligence, and blindly see what they want to see rather than the reality and facts.

But these were accounts from Pilgrems, who had talked to the Native Americans, who told them about "Bigfoot".

They're still nothing but old stories ... not actual facts. There are no actual facts that even remotely point to Bigfoot or the others being real, let alone anything that proves it.

On the other hand there's immense proof that they don't exist - the biggest proof being that nobody has ever actually captured or find a dead one, and nobody with any legitamacy has ever seen one - they're all backwoods loonies trying to make a fast buck. All the so-called evidence like hair samples have been disproven as nothing but normal animal fur, and things like footprints, movie clips, photos, etc. are extremely easy to fake (and even eaiser these days thinks to powerful home computers).

[Buzz_Bumble]

"Proof" that smaller Bigfoot-like creatures live in American forests and spy on humans ...








Well, proof that someone can easily Photoshop Star Wars' Ewoks into family photos ayway. 

[Kitsune]

Lol!
I personally don't believe in bigfoot.

[Ungatt Trunn]

Me and one of my friends want to go on a hunt for Bigfoot, just for fun
BTW, Buzz_Bumble, no double posting please

[Buzz_Bumble]

What double-posting?? 

[W0NWILL]

Posting more than once in a row.

[Buzz_Bumble]

They were on two different days. 

[W0NWILL]

Yup. Still is discouraged.

[Ungatt Trunn]

I was looking at the chart about Bigfoot sightings rate in the USA and Canada when I noticed something. Here, I'll show you the chart again:

Now study it very closely. What do you see?
Here is what you should see: The Bigfoot sightings rate differs significantly from one place to another. In some places, there are very few sightings, while in other places, Bigfoot sightings are quite common. Now, if all Bigfoot sightings are just hoaxes, then shouldn't Bigfoot sighting rates be just about the same in all places? But we see here that sighting rates are much higher or much lower here or there. So either it's just a big coincident, or...Bigfoot very well might be real.

[Redwaller]

There are a few things here:

1. Who made that chart?

2. They probably saw bears and moose and thought they were Bigfoots.

3. Maybe even just dirt mounds from afare.

[Ungatt Trunn]

There are a few things here:

1. Who made that chart?

2. They probably saw bears and moose and thought they were Bigfoots.

3. Maybe even just dirt mounds from afare.

To question 1: A very trusted Goverment sorce. But that was all that I was able to learn about were the chart came from.

To question 2: Some sightings just cant be explained like that.

To question 3: That is VERY unlikly.

[Redwaller]

To third answer: NOT!

Once, we were at a certain distance of a spot, and my brother said he thought he saw a bear lying down, so we looked, and it did look like one, so we ran. Another day, we went back, and it was a truck's shovel!

See, it is not unlikely.